Diogenes laertius poetry9/24/2023 He was banished, or fled from, Sinope over debasement of currency. I examine in detail how this model, which was originally inspired simply by considerations regarding the different places in which the traditions ß ourished, developed in various phases of ancient and modern philosophy along with reß ections on the distinct theoretical characteristics of the different traditions and on their relations to Plato, whose philosophical system has generally been seen as a synthesis of them.Diogenes ( / d aɪ ˈ ɒ dʒ ɪ n iː z/ dy- OJ-in-eez Greek: Διογένης, Diogénēs 412/404 BC – 323 BC ), also known as Diogenes the Cynic ( Διογένης ὁ Κυνικός, Diogénēs ho Kynikós) or Diogenes of Sinope, was a Greek philosopher and one of the founders of Cynicism.ĭiogenes was a controversial figure. This cliché concerns the division of early Greek philosophy into an Ionian tradition founded by Thales and an Italic one founded by Pythagoras – although a tripartite division is also often found, in texts in which the Eleatic lineage is also given a certain importance and autonomy. This paper traces the history of a particular cliché of scholarship on the Presocratic philosophers which has persisted from ancient commentators until the present day, and in whose development Hermann Diels work constitutes an important stage. Palabras clave: Pirronismo, Diógenes Laercio, Timón de Fliunte, catálogo épico, historia. Estos usos, filosófico y literario, constituyen los usos particulares del lenguaje pirrónico. En esta obra, el catálogo épico se muestra como un poderoso mecanismo que permite informar, hacer historia de la filosofía y reportar el lugar de Pirrón en ella sin postular tesis sustantivas. La segunda caracterización se deriva del registro elegido por Timón de Fliunte en sus Silloi. La primera, presente en el testimonio de Diógenes Laercio en sus Vidas de filósofos ilustres 9.71-78, evidenciará un uso del lenguaje humano cuyas estrategias permiten un empleo filosófico más amplio que el asertórico. Se examinarán dos caracterizaciones de ese uso. La lengua de los pirrónicos RESUMEN: Este artículo caracteriza el uso del lenguaje del escéptico pirrónico con el ánimo de examinar si tal uso es susceptible de las críticas dogmáticas, especialmente de las estoicas. This literary use and the previous philosophical one constitute the particular uses of Pyrrhonian language. In this work, the Epic catalogue shows itself as a powerful mechanism it allows to report, to make history about philosophy itself and to offer an account of Pyrrho's place in it without postulating substantive theses. The second characterisation depends on the discourse chosen by Timon of Phlius in his Silloi. The first one, reported by Diogenes Laertius in his Lives of Eminent Philosophers 9.71-78, will be discussed as a logical use of human language broader than a philosophical one. It will examine two characterisations of that use. This article characterises how the Pyrrhonian Sceptic uses language to test if such use is susceptible to Dogmatic criticisms, especially from a Stoic perspective.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |